雅(ya)思(si)寫作(zuo)話題及范文:Write about the following topic:Governments should sp...

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

您應該(gai)在這項任(ren)務上花(hua)費大約40分鐘。

寫下以下主題：

政府應該把錢花在鐵路而(er)不是公路上。

你(ni)在多大程(cheng)度上同(tong)意(yi)或不同(tong)意(yi)這一說(shuo)法(fa)？

給出你(ni)的(de)答(da)案(an)的(de)理由(you)，并(bing)包(bao)括你(ni)自己(ji)的(de)知識或經驗中的(de)任何相關(guan)例子。

至少寫(xie)250個單詞。

范文

As far as I am concerned, governments have the responsibility to fund construction of infrastructure, no matter whether it is rails or roads as both modes of transport are invested with their own functions.

Investment in road schemes could carry immeasurable benefits to all road users including drivers, pedestrians and cyclists. This is primarily because smooth, smart and sustainable roads may decrease the likelihood of external social costs they entail such as congestion, accidents, pollution and depletion of oil resources, and so on. As well as reducing costs, roads surpass railways as they facilitate personal and goods transport in a more flexible and convenient way. Such flexibility and convenience could be further promoted with financial support from the government, which in turn prosper regional economy.

In contrast to road travel which enhances individual mobility at a relatively higher cost, railway transport has long been known as being cost-effective and being able to deliver large quantities of bulk materials and large queues of passengers in a swift way. Also noteworthy is that despite considerable loss of cropland in construction and occasional unpunctuality, railway transport is capable of carrying goods to those inaccessible faraway areas like mountainous regions or isolated wilderness regions. As a result of this, the investment in railway construction would to a large extent accelerate trade within or beyond national boundaries.

In both cases, besides boosting regional and national economy, the infuse of governmental fund into the construction of both modes of transport could boost the development of modern logistics, thereby creating more employment opportunities, and enhancing income opportunities.

All in all, both rails and roads make up the backbone of transport in a country, as a result of which, governments cannot afford to neglect either.

就(jiu)我而言，政府有(you)責任為(wei)基礎設施建設提(ti)供資金，無論是鐵路(lu)還是公(gong)路(lu)，因為(wei)這兩種運輸(shu)方式(shi)都有(you)各自的功能(neng)。

對道(dao)路計劃的投資可(ke)以(yi)給(gei)所有道(dao)路使(shi)用者帶來不可(ke)估量(liang)的好處，包括司機、行人和(he)自(zi)行車手(shou)。這主(zhu)要(yao)是因(yin)為平坦、智能(neng)(neng)和(he)可(ke)持續的道(dao)路可(ke)能(neng)(neng)會(hui)降(jiang)低外部(bu)社會(hui)成本的可(ke)能(neng)(neng)性，例如擁堵、事故(gu)、污染(ran)和(he)石油資源耗竭等。在降(jiang)低成本的同時，公路也超越了鐵路，因(yin)為公路以(yi)更靈活(huo)、更便捷的方式便利了個人和(he)貨物運輸(shu)。在政(zheng)府(fu)的財(cai)政(zheng)支持下，可(ke)以(yi)進(jin)一步促進(jin)這種(zhong)靈活(huo)性和(he)便利性，從(cong)而繁榮(rong)區(qu)域(yu)經濟。

與以相對(dui)較高的(de)成本提高個(ge)人機動性的(de)公(gong)路(lu)運輸(shu)相比，鐵(tie)路(lu)運輸(shu)長期以來一(yi)直被認(ren)為(wei)具有成本效(xiao)益(yi)，能夠快(kuai)速運送大(da)量散裝材(cai)料和大(da)量排隊的(de)乘(cheng)客。同樣值得注意的(de)是(shi)，盡管在建(jian)設過程中(zhong)大(da)量損失農田，而且偶爾(er)不準時，但鐵(tie)路(lu)運輸(shu)能夠將(jiang)貨物運送到偏遠地區(qu)，如(ru)山(shan)區(qu)或與世隔絕的(de)荒野地區(qu)。因此，鐵(tie)路(lu)建(jian)設投資(zi)將(jiang)在很大(da)程度上加速國內(nei)外貿易。

在這(zhe)兩種情況下，除(chu)了促進區域和國家經濟，政府(fu)資金(jin)注入兩種運輸方式的建設可以促進現代(dai)物流的發展，從而創(chuang)造(zao)更多的就業機會(hui)，增加收入機會(hui)。

總之，鐵(tie)路和公路都是一個(ge)國家(jia)的交通支柱，因此，政府(fu)也不能忽視這一點。

>> 雅思 托福 免費(fei)課程學習，AI量身規劃讓英語學習不再困難<<