雅思寫作運動類題目

Some countries achieve international sporting success by building specialized facilities only for the training of top athletes,instead of providing facilities that everyone can use.Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

一些(xie)國(guo)家為了(le)取(qu)得國(guo)際體(ti)育賽事方(fang)面的成功，為頂尖運動員修建(jian)了(le)專門的設施，而非提(ti)供每(mei)個人都能夠使(shi)用的場(chang)館。你認為這是種積極的發(fa)展(zhan)還是消(xiao)極的發(fa)展(zhan)？

雅思寫作大作文范文

開頭段

Heavy investment in sports facilities aimed at professional athletes is common in countries that want to compete in international events.This is a positive development for national pride but negative on the whole as it takes funding away from the average citizen.

為專業運動(dong)員(yuan)投入大(da)量資金修建運動(dong)設施在一些(xie)想要(yao)贏(ying)得國際比(bi)賽的國家中十分常見。這(zhe)對于國家榮耀而言(yan)十分有用，但(dan)因為它挪用了普通市(shi)民本(ben)應享有的資金，因此整體上是消(xiao)極的。

體育賽事成功的好處

Proponents of this practice would argue that it brings the nation together.The best examples of this relate to international competitions like the summer and winter Olympics.China and the United States have famously invested millions in building sports facilities for prospective Olympians and the results in terms of medals justify the expenditure.The wider implications for national unity come from an entire country watching the telecasts and rooting together.Divisive domestic disputes are temporarily forgotten as everyone focuses on the progress of their country.Much of this would be impossible without specialised sports facilities for the best competitors.

這(zhe)一做法的(de)(de)支持者認為它能夠將國(guo)(guo)(guo)家團結起(qi)來。其最好的(de)(de)案例(li)與諸如夏季和冬季奧(ao)運(yun)(yun)會這(zhe)樣的(de)(de)國(guo)(guo)(guo)際比賽(sai)有(you)關。中國(guo)(guo)(guo)和美國(guo)(guo)(guo)投資百(bai)萬為有(you)潛力(li)獲(huo)獎(jiang)的(de)(de)奧(ao)林(lin)匹克運(yun)(yun)動(dong)(dong)(dong)員(yuan)修建運(yun)(yun)動(dong)(dong)(dong)設(she)施(shi)，而獎(jiang)牌的(de)(de)結果也使得這(zhe)些花費合理化(hua)。整個國(guo)(guo)(guo)家一起(qi)觀看(kan)電(dian)視(shi)轉播有(you)助(zhu)于民族團結。可(ke)能引起(qi)分裂的(de)(de)內部(bu)爭論被暫時拋(pao)之腦(nao)后(hou)，因為每個人(ren)都(dou)在關注他們國(guo)(guo)(guo)家的(de)(de)進步。而如果頂尖運(yun)(yun)動(dong)(dong)(dong)員(yuan)沒有(you)專業運(yun)(yun)動(dong)(dong)(dong)設(she)施(shi)的(de)(de)話，這(zhe)一點很難實(shi)現。

專門場館的壞處

However,these facilities benefit a select few over the majority.Funding for such facilities is a limited part of a federal budget that must cover essential areas like health,education,and the military.Any money diverted towards preparing world-class athletes for international competitions is to some extent a waste as it cuts into the budget for facilities for average people.For example,many inner-city youths in poorer neighbourhoods lack access to parks and such facilities and this has been identified as one of the factors that allows for poverty to be inherited over generations.Direct the funding away from these expensive gyms for top athletes and it would be possible to build many more facilities that serve a much wider and underserved segment of the population.

然而(er)(er)(er)，這(zhe)(zhe)些設(she)施(shi)只(zhi)使少部(bu)分(fen)人(ren)獲益，而(er)(er)(er)忽略了(le)大部(bu)分(fen)人(ren)。修建這(zhe)(zhe)些設(she)施(shi)的(de)(de)(de)資金來自于十分(fen)有限的(de)(de)(de)國家(jia)預算，而(er)(er)(er)這(zhe)(zhe)些預算還需(xu)要涵蓋(gai)諸如健康(kang)、教育(yu)和軍事(shi)這(zhe)(zhe)樣的(de)(de)(de)關鍵(jian)領域(yu)。任(ren)何用(yong)于幫(bang)助世界級別的(de)(de)(de)運動(dong)員備戰(zhan)國際比賽的(de)(de)(de)資金在某(mou)種(zhong)程度上(shang)來說都是浪費，因(yin)為它導致服(fu)(fu)務于普通民眾的(de)(de)(de)資金的(de)(de)(de)減少。例(li)如，許(xu)多(duo)城市貧(pin)困區域(yu)的(de)(de)(de)年輕人(ren)無法享(xiang)受公園一(yi)類的(de)(de)(de)設(she)施(shi)。而(er)(er)(er)這(zhe)(zhe)被(bei)認(ren)為是貧(pin)窮(qiong)在一(yi)代(dai)代(dai)人(ren)之(zhi)間延續的(de)(de)(de)因(yin)素之(zhi)一(yi)。將(jiang)資金從(cong)頂尖(jian)運動(dong)員所享(xiang)有的(de)(de)(de)昂貴體育(yu)館(guan)上(shang)挪走，這(zhe)(zhe)樣就(jiu)能夠建造更多(duo)的(de)(de)(de)，服(fu)(fu)務于更廣(guang)泛的(de)(de)(de)貧(pin)困人(ren)口(kou)的(de)(de)(de)設(she)施(shi)。

結論

In conclusion,despite the less tangible benefits to national cohesiveness,this is a negative in general as it favours a talented minority.More resources should be allocated towards facilities for those in greater need.

總的(de)(de)來說(shuo)，盡管在國家凝聚力方面(mian)有切實(shi)的(de)(de)好處，但這大體而言是(shi)消極的(de)(de)，因為它偏向于少(shao)部分擁有天賦的(de)(de)群體。更(geng)多的(de)(de)資源應(ying)該被用于為那些貧困的(de)(de)人修建(jian)設施。

>> 雅思 托福 免費課程學(xue)習，AI量身規劃讓英語(yu)學(xue)習不再困難<<